Is the shift to taxation at the point of destination inexorable?

Abstract

Ongoing discussions on the reform of the international tax system continue to be  dominated by the G20/OECD's proposed "two-pillar" solution - which includes the introduction of a new allocation of taxing rights to market states (Pillar 1) and a 15% global minimum tax rate (Pillar 2). 
 
Despite the initial intention to treat the Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 measures as two parts of the same package, there is increasing discussion about the possibility of decoupling Pillar 2 from Pillar 1 and enacting Pillar 2 on an accelerated time scale. CBT Associate Fellow, Richard Collier, together with Matt Andrew,  explore this issue in a paper titled, Is the shift to taxation at the point of destination inexorable?
 

Working paper

WP 22/03 Matt Andrew and Richard Collier, Is the shift to taxation at the point of destination inexorable?

Blog

Could Pillar 2 Be Enough?

Richard S. Collier

Other relevant research

What Is the Substance‐Based Carve‐Out under Pillar 2? And How Will It Affect Tax Competition?

Michael P. Devereux, Martin Simmler, John Vella and Heydon Wardell-Burrus, EconPol Policy Brief 39, 2021